I think it makes sense that people were concerned about the introduction of feeds to Facebook. Sure, all of that information was already readily available, but it became orders of magnitude easier for people to discover, to the point where they didn't have to LOOK for the information.
Alex Argo
· 2 years ago
I think it makes sense that people were concerned about the introduction of feeds to Facebook. Sure, all of that information was already readily available, but it became orders of magnitude easier for people to discover, to the point where they didn't have to LOOK for the information.
Josh Kim
· 2 years ago
I'll try to write something in response to your comment, Alex. But for now:
You agree, indeed, that the information is already available. The access to that information can just as easily be controlled by redefining what "friends" are on facebook. I feel as though this issue is actually a much deeper topic having to do with defining who "friends" are in the world of 0's and 1's. (Either you're my "friend" or not my friend, end of discussion.)
I hope that clarifies a little bit about what I meant. Although, I think that my anti-backlash sentiments was a little bit too strong... most likely I took it to the extreme again...
Josh Kim
· 2 years ago
I'll try to write something in response to your comment, Alex. But for now:
You agree, indeed, that the information is already available. The access to that information can just as easily be controlled by redefining what "friends" are on facebook. I feel as though this issue is actually a much deeper topic having to do with defining who "friends" are in the world of 0's and 1's. (Either you're my "friend" or not my friend, end of discussion.)
I hope that clarifies a little bit about what I meant. Although, I think that my anti-backlash sentiments was a little bit too strong... most likely I took it to the extreme again...
All Comments
I think it makes sense that people were concerned about the introduction of feeds to Facebook. Sure, all of that information was already readily available, but it became orders of magnitude easier for people to discover, to the point where they didn't have to LOOK for the information.
I think it makes sense that people were concerned about the introduction of feeds to Facebook. Sure, all of that information was already readily available, but it became orders of magnitude easier for people to discover, to the point where they didn't have to LOOK for the information.
I'll try to write something in response to your comment, Alex. But for now:
You agree, indeed, that the information is already available. The access to that information can just as easily be controlled by redefining what "friends" are on facebook. I feel as though this issue is actually a much deeper topic having to do with defining who "friends" are in the world of 0's and 1's. (Either you're my "friend" or not my friend, end of discussion.)
I hope that clarifies a little bit about what I meant. Although, I think that my anti-backlash sentiments was a little bit too strong... most likely I took it to the extreme again...
I'll try to write something in response to your comment, Alex. But for now:
You agree, indeed, that the information is already available. The access to that information can just as easily be controlled by redefining what "friends" are on facebook. I feel as though this issue is actually a much deeper topic having to do with defining who "friends" are in the world of 0's and 1's. (Either you're my "friend" or not my friend, end of discussion.)
I hope that clarifies a little bit about what I meant. Although, I think that my anti-backlash sentiments was a little bit too strong... most likely I took it to the extreme again...